member login


 ASIHW Events Calendar

ASIHW events and meetings, as well as related and important wellness and nutritional events around the country and world.

Ultrein™ and Cancer - Case studies

Ultrein™ and Cancer - Case studies
Apr 07 2017 posted by ASIHW 0

Ultrein™ and Cancer - Cased Studies Ultrein™ (a Specially Processed Whey Protein – SPWP) is a rather unique product in how it boosts glutathione naturally in the body (see Note 3 below). This natural boost is similar to eating any natural raw food that is high in glutathione precursors. These are typically raw animal proteins such as raw milk, beef, fish and eggs. Unfortunately humans don’t eat their natural foods in a raw state raw anymore and the result is unnatural nutrition that is ineffective in preventing, curtailing and/or resolving many poor health conditions such as cancer. Ultrein™ is specially processed to optimize important glutathione precursors and immune system factors. Following are a few case studies of how boosting glutathione through Specially Prepared Whey Proteins (SPWP's like Ultrein™) can aid the body in defense against cancer. Please note that these case studies are presented as educational information not as a means to prevent, diagnose, treat or cure any disease. CASE STUDY #1 – CERVICAL CANCER GENDER: FEMALE AGE: 55 MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS: Pre-cancerous uterine tissue biopsy MEDICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Hysterectomy MEDICAL TREATMENT: None DIETARY CHANGES: None SUPPLEMENTATION: 20 gm SPWP daily for three months OTHER TREATMENTS: None RESULTS: The next (about 6 mo) tissue biopsy returned normal cell types FOLLOWUP: The supplementation was stopped by the client as the client did not want to continue taking the supplement due to cost concerns. Seven years later the precancerous tissue returned and the client chose to have a hysterectomy in lieu of taking the SPWP. COMMENTS: In addition to the disappearance of the pre-cancerous tissues while supplementing with the SPWP the client also noted an improvement in body mass index in the form of a reduction in waist inches even though her weight stayed the same. It is suggested that if the client had continued to take the SPWP she may not have had a recurrence of the precancerous tissue and also may have continued to see improvements in BMI and even possibly weight loss. Her BMI had returned to pre-SPWP levels several months after she stopped taking the SPWP. CASE STUDY #2 – BREAST CANCER GENDER: Female AGE: 56 at onset MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS: 4mm diameter Estrogen sensitive invasive fast growing ductile breast cancer, not BRACA MEDICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Partial or full mastectomy, radiation; follow up with Tamoxifen MEDICAL TREATMENT: None for 4 years with only slow growth due to other changes, then lumpectomy with focused radiation follow-up DIETARY CHANGES: Significant dietary changes to eliminate sugars and simple carbohydrates with limited healthy fats and proteins; juicing and complex carbohydrates were the primary diet; avoided estrogen mimickers such as soy OTHER TREATMENTS: Reiki, energy clearances, emotional clearances, cold light laser SUPPLEMENTATION: Multiple herbal supplements; 20-40 gm SPWP daily started 3.5 years into the protocol RESULTS: Very slow growth of the cancer tumor over the 4 years preceding the lumpectomy. Twenty grams of SPWP did not have any effect. It actually started shrinking once the SPWP was increased to 40 gm per day and methods to reboot the glutathione regulation process were enacted. The final lump when removed was surprisingly only about twice the size of the original tumor. The tumor was remarkable in that it was encapsulated with unusual clear margins around it. A sentinel lymph node was removed under the arm and was found to be normal. Focused radiation from inside out was employed to assure medical "kill” of any possibly malignant surrounding tissues. FOLLOWUP: Tamoxifen was not taken even though it was strongly recommended. Instead more natural supplements to block estrogen were taken for two years following the surgery. A healthy diet has been maintained along with daily supplementation of the SPWP at 20 gm per day. Seven years after the surgery there is scar tissue but no obvious signs of any recurring cancer by Mammogram. The client remains healthy. COMMENTS: The client prefers Thermograms to Mammograms due to the inherent radiation in a Mammogram and is in the process of getting base line Thermograms for future reference. All doctors were surprised by the lack of rapid growth and spreading of the tumor. It was even more evident when there were no cancer cells found anywhere else in the body, especially in the sentinel lymph node after 4 years due to the type of cancer. The Oncologist advised against taking supplements and the SPWP at any time. During the radiation treatment the client was advised not to take the SPWP by the Radiologist as its use had not been "fully” studied with radiation. However the radiologist was interested in the product and benefits. The client continued taking the SPWP during radiation as it was her understanding that research indicates it can actually complement and improve the prognosis from radiation treatment. CASE STUDY #3 – LUNG CANCER GENDER: Male AGE: 84 MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS: Client was in a nursing home for Alzheimer’s and developed subsequent lung cancer. MEDICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Doctors recommended no treatment as patient was unresponsive due to Alzheimer’s and treatment of lung cancer might only extend his situation while causing unnecessary additional medical expense. MEDICAL TREATMENT: None DIETARY CHANGES: None OTHER TREATMENTS: None SUPPLEMENTATION: Client was given 20 gm of SPWP by his family to see if he would tolerate it and if so then continue as would be appropriate. RESULTS: Within about 30 minutes the client sat up and started speaking for the first time in about 4 years. The client tolerated the supplementation and had obvious benefit so it was continued. Within about one month it was noted that the lung cancer had stopped growing and he was maintaining daily interaction with family. FOLLOWUP: The client passed away several months later from unspecified causes not directly related to either the Alzheimer’s or lung cancer COMMENTS: While results toward Alzheimer’s are possible the dramatic results observed by this client toward Alzheimer’s are remarkable and unusual. The results for cancer are typical depending upon dose. A dose of 40 gm per day may have been more appropriate in an attempt to aid the body in eliminating the cancer. CASE STUDY #4 – COLON CANCER GENDER: Male AGE: 65 MEDICAL DIAGNOSIS: Biopsy and x-ray noted numerous carcinogenic polyps and tumors in the colon (multiple times). MEDICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Surgery, radiation and/or chemo MEDICAL TREATMENT: Initially none except by Naturopath recommendations NATUROPATH RECOMMENDATIONS: Dietary changes and supplements DIETARY CHANGES: Diet restricted from sugars and high glycemic foods including most grains and starchy vegetables. OTHER TREATMENTS: See "Results” below. SUPPLEMENTATION: Specific supplementation to assist in building the immune system and restrict cancer growth. SPWP was strongly not recommended by the Naturopath. RESULTS: The client initially declined traditional medical treatment twice. The first time the client utilized the Naturopath recommendations for several months. While the cancer slowed in growth it still continued to be present and growing. After several months the client was convinced by family members to add the SPWP (at 40 grams per day) to his supplementation. Within a few months the cancer went into remission. The client felt that it was resolved and returned to his original diet and dropped most of his supplementation including the SPWP. Approximately 6-9 months later the cancer returned. The cycle repeated itself as the client a second time began following the advice of the Naturopath and did not supplement with the SPWP. The growth of the cancer slowed but did not stop. Again he was convinced to start the SPWP by relatives. The cancer again went into remission after a few months of starting the SPWP. Again the special diet was set aside along with most of the supplements (including the SPWP) and the cancer returned a third time several months later. This time the client decided to follow standard medical treatment plans. The cancer was removed by drastic surgery along with portions of his colon. The colon required re-sectioning and a period of using a colostomy was endured. Radiation treatment was employed to assure destruction of the cancer. The supplements and SPWP were not utilized, nor were significant dietary changes as the medical establishment advised against it due to unknown benefits and their claim that it could neutralize any benefit their treatment might provide. The cancer again returned a fourth time. Chemo was utilized in attempt to control the growth of the cancer but failed. FOLLOWUP: The client passed away several months after the fourth recurrence of the colon cancer. COMMENTS: It is interesting that recommendations by the Naturopath slowed the growth of the cancer but did not stop it. The Naturopath remained against the use of the SPWP in spite of the positive effect it had in combination with dietary and supplementation changes that were recommended by the Naturopath. Medical doctors advised against the use of the SPWP during both of their treatment programs as there were "no large studies proving benefit”. It is suggested that the client had severe oxidative stressors that had not been fully addressed allowing a recurrence of the cancer. Oxidative stress is something that the SPWP excels at resolving by naturally boosting glutathione levels. It is possible that had he retained specific dietary changes and supplements, especially the SPWP, he may not have experienced any of the relapses of the cancer. MORE TO COME - INCLUDING PANCREATIC, KIDNEY AND SKIN CANCER! NOTES: This information is provided for educational purposes only. It is not intended to prevent, diagnose, treat or cure any disease. If you have an experience you would like to share with us please use our contact page to submit details or log in and use our support page. There are numerous whey proteins on the market. Most are not SPWP (Specially Prepared Whey Proteins). While there are a few whey proteins that claim to boost glutathione, most only provide minimal support. Please read this article for details on a comparison of Ultrein™ to other whey proteins. Theses case studies come from cases utilizing known beneficial SPWP's like Ultrein™. These case studies are considered to be "anecdotal" by the medical establishment as no large long term studies have been done with Ultrein™ (or any SPWP's) and cancer. In addition since the medical establishment discourages the use of SPWP's these case studies are subject to bias against the use of SPWP. Therefore it is extremely difficult to get an unbiased case study of the benefit and efficacy for SPWP. It is our hope that the medical establishment will fund efforts to research the natural benefits of SPWP's toward cancer and many other adverse health conditions. We invite them to do so and would participate if requested.

read more →

your cart

no items in your cart

FAQ categories

content categories